Penn State Sports Magazine
Issue link: https://comanpub.uberflip.com/i/1322704
T
here's no debate when it comes to
which topic dominated the message
board at BWI's website this year.
That same topic – the pandemic – dom-
inated just about everything in our lives,
so it's understandable and expected. But
like every other college football message
board, recruiting wasn't far behind, and
boy, just about everyone had an opinion
on Penn State's recruiting class this year.
With Penn State holding only 13 com-
mitments throughout most of the fall,
everyone wanted to know what went
wrong. At one point, the class sunk to
No. 38 in the Rivals Team Rankings.
Well, I'm here to tell you that not much
has really changed for the Nittany Lions.
Sure, it wasn't a perfect year. But the
Class of 2021 really isn't all that di=erent
from its immediate predecessor.
To understand why it ranked so low for
the longest time, you have to understand
how the rankings work. One thing most
people don't know is that the 20 high-
est-rated players in any given class are
the only ones counted. With the major-
ity of recruiting classes reaching that
20-person threshold, the Rivals.com
system ensures that a class of 28 players
won't necessarily rank higher than a
class of 23 just because of volume. Rivals
also has a bonus-point system for play-
ers who rank within the Rivals250. Obvi-
ously, a ;ve-star player from the top of
the list will get you more points than,
say, No. 243.
Now that you know those two things,
would you like to guess what this year's
class, when averaged out with all the
other classes above it, would rank on Ri-
vals if Penn State had enough scholar-
ships to sign 20 prospects? As of
mid-December, it would have ranked
17th, just two spots below where the
Lions ;nished last year. In fact, the aver-
age points-per-player-committed in
2021 was 97.3 as of this writing, sub-
stantially higher than last year's class,
which was 80.1.
Did people complain about the 2020
class? Sure, you'll always ;nd fans who
expect better. But last year's complaints
paled in comparison to the disenchant-
ment we saw this year.
Small recruiting classes aren't unique
to Penn State, either. Just two years ago,
Ohio State's 17-member class ranked
21st overall, and that group included
;ve-star defensive lineman Zach Harri-
son. Just one year prior, Michigan ;n-
ished 24th with 19 commitments. Even
Clemson ;nished all the way down at
No. 22 in 2017. I'm not saying this class
is on par with the classes that the Buck-
eyes and Tigers reeled in during those
years. I
am saying that small classes
o>en look worse than they really are. It's
a